Study Finds “Dual Mobility” Hip Replacement Implant Reduces Risk of Dislocation

Hip replacement surgery is highly successful in relieving pain, restoring mobility and improving quality of life. More than 330,000 procedures are performed each year in the United States, and that number is expected to almost double by the year 2030. 

 As with all surgical procedures, the possibility of a complication exists, and dislocation is the most common problem. The risk of dislocation is higher in patients who have had a second hip replacement, known as revision surgery. Some people need a revision surgery many years after their first hip replacement when the original implant wears out. Hip instability after joint replacement is another reason a patient might need a revision surgery.    

 Research conducted at Hospital for Special Surgery, where I am director of research of the Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, and other joint replacement centers indicates that a newer type of artificial hip known as a “modular dual mobility” implant could be a good option for patients who need a revision surgery. Our study was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons in Dallas in November. 

 Although the concept of dual mobility was originally developed in France in the 1970s, the technology is relatively new in the United States. Our study found that the newer technology with modular dual mobility components offered increased stability, lowering the risk of dislocation, without compromising hip range of motion in patients having a revision surgery. 

 “Dual mobility” refers to the bearing surface of the implant - where the joint surfaces come together to support one’s body weight. A hip replacement implant is a ball-in-socket mechanism, designed to simulate a human hip joint. Typical components include a stem that inserts into the femur (thigh bone), a ball that replaces the round head of the thigh bone, and a shell that lines the hip socket.  

 Modular dual mobility implants provide an additional bearing surface compared to a traditional implant. With the dual mobility hip, a large polyethylene plastic head fits inside a polished metal hip socket component, and an additional smaller metal or ceramic head is snap-fit within the polyethylene head. 

 Currently, there are few large-scale outcome studies on the modular dual mobility device in revision hip replacement. We set out to determine the rate of dislocation and the need for another surgery following revision hip replacement using this implant and report on the functional outcomes.

 The study included 370 patients who underwent revision hip replacement with the dual mobility implant between April 2011 and April 2017. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 65.8 years. Clinical, radiographic and patient reported-outcome information was collected. 

 To be included in the final report, patients needed to be seen for follow-up for at least two years after their surgery, and the average follow-up was 3.3 years. At the latest follow-up, we found that surgery with the dual mobility implant resulted in a very low rate of instability for the revision patients, namely 2.9 percent, with good functional improvement and a low rate of reoperation. While longer-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the newer device, in our study there was clearly a benefit provided by the dual mobility implant in the first few years following revision surgery.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“Dual Mobility” Hip Replacement Does Double Duty: Relieves Pain and Reduces Risk of Dislocation

Image
Hip replacement to relieve arthritis pain is considered one of the most effective surgeries in the United States. Over the past decade, improvements in surgical technique, implant design, anesthesia and pain control after surgery have contributed to its success, says Geoffrey Westrich, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS).  More than 450,000 total hip replacements are performed each year in the United States, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. One of the most noteworthy advances is what’s known as a “dual mobility” hip replacement, according to Dr. Westrich, who has conducted several studies on the implant. He and colleagues have found that the dual mobility prosthesis reduces the risk of dislocation, one of the most common complications after hip replacement surgery. While the incidence is less than 2% at Hospital for Special Surgery and other major joint replacement centers, it is significantly higher at some other locations....
Read more

Did Halting In-Person Visits During Covid-19 Affect Knee Replacement Outcomes at Hospital for Special Surgery?

Image
At Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), we set out to evaluate outcomes for recent knee replacement patients when nonessential in-person doctor visits and physical therapy were halted in March 2020 due to the pandemic. Our thought-provoking study found that the shutdown did not lead to a higher complication rate, nor did it affect patient-reported outcomes after surgery. Our study appeared online ahead of print in the Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery . Elective, nonessential orthopedic care, including in-person office visits and physical therapy, was halted on March 16, 2020 at the onset of the COVID-19 surge in New York City. At that time, HSS rapidly expanded its telehealth and tele-rehabilitation services so patients could receive their care remotely, including post-operative visits and physical therapy.  Our study aimed to assess complications during the first 90 days following surgery and patient-reported outcomes within one year of surgery. We identified 624 patients...
Read more

Our Study at HSS Finds Knee Replacement with Robotic Assistance Leads to Lower Complication Rate

Image
These days you hear a lot about the use of robotics in joint replacement and other surgical procedures. Many orthopedic surgeons who perform robot-assisted surgery find that it improves the accuracy and predictability of a knee or hip replacement.  Indeed, the use of computer-assisted navigation and robotic assistance for total knee replacement has grown tremendously over the past few years and shows no sign of slowing down. Among American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons attending the 2020 annual meeting, 77% of respondents indicated that they used technology in their surgical cases. The most common reason they cited was to increase surgical precision. A large study we undertook at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) found another major advantage of using a robot. Accessing and analyzing a huge national database with information on more than one million knee replacement patients, we found that surgery performed with robotic assistance led to a lower complication rate in the fir...
Read more