Could a Cementless Knee Replacement Benefit Patients? Early Results of Our HSS Study

Cementless knee replacement, an alternative to traditional cemented knee replacement surgery, is gaining interest in the field of orthopedic surgery. We launched a study at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) to compare outcomes of a modern cementless knee implant to the standard knee implant that requires bone cement for fixation. 

Our study found no difference in hospital length of stay, complications, hospital readmission within 90 days of surgery, or rates of revision surgery at two-year patient follow-up. We presented our research at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2022 Annual Meeting in Chicago. 


With respect to time spent in the operating room (OR), using the cementless implant reduced OR time by 25%, saving an average of 27 minutes. In a cementless total knee replacement, you do not have to wait for the cement to harden and dry like you do in a cemented knee replacement, which saves time. 

Reduced time in the OR under anesthesia is advantageous to patients, but that's not the only potential benefit of the uncemented prosthesis. With the cementless knee replacement, the components are press fit into place for ‘biologic fixation,’ which basically means the bone will grow into the implant. If there is initial biologic fixation, implant loosening over time should be less likely and a total knee replacement could potentially last much longer.

In a traditional knee replacement, implant components are secured in the joint using bone cement. It’s a tried-and-true technique that has worked well for decades. But eventually, over time, the cement starts to loosen from the bone and/or the implant. When it wears out or loosens, patients generally need a second knee replacement, known as a revision surgery. The cemented knee implant used in a traditional joint replacement usually lasts 15 to 20 years. 

A well-designed cementless implant could make loosening over time less likely, enabling a total knee replacement to last much longer. Implant longevity is an important consideration, especially for younger patients with arthritis who opt for joint replacement to maintain their active lifestyle. They generally put more demands on their joint, causing more wear and tear and potential loosening. 

Cementless implants have been used successfully in total hip replacement surgery for many years. It has been much more challenging to develop a cementless prosthesis that would work well in the knee because of the knee’s particular anatomy.

In the past, a number of cementless knee implants were shown to have design flaws, with loosening from the shin bone. In our study, we used a newer cementless prosthesis that not demonstrate this type of loosening in previous published studies. We set out to see how the implant fared in HSS patients.

We reviewed 598 primary unilateral total knee replacements at HSS (170 cementless and 428 cemented) of the same design from 2016 to 2018. Patients undergoing the cementless procedure were younger overall, with a mean age of 63, versus 68 for those having a traditional cemented knee replacement. Good bone quality is important in the success of cementless knee fixation. 

There was no statistically significant difference in hospital length of stay, complications, or hospital readmission for a problem in the first 90 days after surgery. Ninety-six percent of cementless knee replacement patients versus 95% of those with a cemented knee replacement maintained their implant without the need for revision surgery at two-year follow-up. 

More studies are needed to look at longer-term patient outcomes and implant durability. For more information, visit WestrichMD.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Steroid Injection for Bone-on-Bone Arthritis? Not So Fast!

Image
Sometimes, arthritis gets so bad that nothing seems to help, and people decide they are ready for joint replacement surgery. When that time comes, some patients are surprised to learn they will have to wait a few months because they recently had an injection of a steroid or hyaluronic acid. Waiting is not the only issue. The injections do little to relieve pain when someone has bone-on-bone arthritis and is a candidate for joint replacement. If there is any pain relief at all, it is very short-lived, and most patients are very disappointed. The other issue is that patients who receive a steroid or hyaluronic acid injection should wait approximately three months from the date of their last injection to have a hip or knee replacement. This is because studies have demonstrated an increased risk of infection in the first three months following these injections.   When elective surgeries resumed after the pandemic pause, I saw five patients over a two-week period whose joint replacement
Read more

“Dual Mobility” Hip Replacement Does Double Duty: Relieves Pain and Reduces Risk of Dislocation

Image
Hip replacement to relieve arthritis pain is considered one of the most effective surgeries in the United States. Over the past decade, improvements in surgical technique, implant design, anesthesia and pain control after surgery have contributed to its success, says Geoffrey Westrich, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS).  More than 450,000 total hip replacements are performed each year in the United States, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. One of the most noteworthy advances is what’s known as a “dual mobility” hip replacement, according to Dr. Westrich, who has conducted several studies on the implant. He and colleagues have found that the dual mobility prosthesis reduces the risk of dislocation, one of the most common complications after hip replacement surgery. While the incidence is less than 2% at Hospital for Special Surgery and other major joint replacement centers, it is significantly higher at some other locations.   “Du
Read more