Study Finds “Dual Mobility” Hip Replacement Attractive Option for Younger Patients


More than 330,000 hip replacement surgeries are performed in the United States each year. Overall, it is a highly successful procedure. However, as with all surgeries, a risk for complications exists. 

Dislocation is one of the most common complications after hip replacement and the number one reason for revision surgery. A study we conducted at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) found that patients who received a newer implant known as a “dual mobility” hip replacement had zero dislocations.  In comparison, study patients who received a traditional fixed bearing hip implant had a dislocation rate of 5 percent.

The research, which focused on patients under 55 years old, was presented last month at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting in New Orleans.  

We were especially interested in seeing how the younger patient population fared because they are generally more active and put more demands and stress on their hip after joint replacement, and this increases the risk of dislocation.

Although the concept of dual mobility was originally developed in France in the 1970s, the technology is relatively new in the United States. “Dual mobility” refers to the bearing surface of the implant - where the joint surfaces come together to support one’s body weight. 

A hip replacement implant is a ball-and-socket mechanism, designed to simulate a human hip joint. Typical components include a stem that inserts into the femur (thigh bone), a ball that replaces the head of the thigh bone, and a shell that lines the hip socket. 

Dual-mobility hip components provide an additional bearing surface. A large polyethylene plastic head fits inside a polished metal hip socket component, and an additional smaller metal or ceramic head is snap-fit within the polyethylene head. "Dual-mobility" means that there are two areas of motion, improving the patient's range of movement and reducing the risk of dislocation.

We compared the dual mobility system with the traditional fixed bearing system in two age-matched groups of patients who had a primary total hip replacement over the same time period. There were 136 patients in each group with a mean age of 48.

At three-year follow-up, the researchers found that the patients who received the dual mobility implant had no dislocations. In the group receiving the standard fixed bearing implant, seven patients, or 5.1 percent, had a dislocation and needed a revision surgery.

Total hip replacement is increasingly being performed in younger patients. The results of our study are encouraging for this active, high demand group of patients and may lessen concerns for dislocation. More research is needed to see how dual mobility implants perform over the long term.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“Dual Mobility” Hip Replacement Does Double Duty: Relieves Pain and Reduces Risk of Dislocation

Image
Hip replacement to relieve arthritis pain is considered one of the most effective surgeries in the United States. Over the past decade, improvements in surgical technique, implant design, anesthesia and pain control after surgery have contributed to its success, says Geoffrey Westrich, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS).  More than 450,000 total hip replacements are performed each year in the United States, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. One of the most noteworthy advances is what’s known as a “dual mobility” hip replacement, according to Dr. Westrich, who has conducted several studies on the implant. He and colleagues have found that the dual mobility prosthesis reduces the risk of dislocation, one of the most common complications after hip replacement surgery. While the incidence is less than 2% at Hospital for Special Surgery and other major joint replacement centers, it is significantly higher at some other locations.   “Du
Read more

Considering a Double Knee Replacement? Here’s What You Need to Know

Orthopedic surgeons perform almost 700,000 knee replacements in the United States each year. The procedure has a high success rate, alleviating pain and restoring an active lifestyle. It’s fairly common for patients to have arthritis in both knees, and they often decide to have both of them replaced. The dilemma many people face is whether to have surgery on both sides at the same time, a procedure referred to as “bilateral knee replacement,” or two separate operations. I always advise people to carefully weigh the pros and cons of each option. Many people want to have a double knee replacement because they feel they can get it over with faster since there’s one surgery, one hospital stay and one course of rehabilitation. For the right patient, it’s a good option. However, double knee replacement is not for everyone, and people should be well-informed before making a decision.                   Studies show that bilateral knee replacement is a more risky procedure and the co
Read more